Municipal settlement plan · work in progress

Schenna

A communal development program for territory and landscape.

Year
Year not stated in supplied portfolio
Location
Schenna / Scena, South Tyrol
Role
Role not stated in supplied portfolio
With
LIA Collective
Illustrated Schenna settlement landscape with buildings, trees, paths, and mapped markers
Settlement development study · Saba Seighali with LIA Collective

Landscape as the planning framework

Source PDF page 8

The current-state analysis begins with landscape as the framework, resource, and identity of Schenna. Its ecological network is treated as infrastructure to be strengthened and woven further into the urban fabric, supporting quality of life, climate resilience, and sustainable development.

Development prioritises internal growth over outward expansion: vacant properties are activated, existing structures are reused, and densification is tied to resource-efficient construction. New areas are considered only when they demonstrate a clear community need and added value.

Natural hazards remain active planning criteria. Building responds to the dynamics of slopes, water, and soil, while squares, paths, neighbourhood meeting points, and nearby landscapes form a connected network of short distances and everyday encounters.

A settlement shaped by agriculture and tourism

Source PDF page 8

Until the nineteenth century, Schenna developed as a dispersed agricultural settlement, with farmsteads spread along the slopes. The acquisition of Schenna Castle by Archduke Johann of Austria in 1845 brought new cultural, administrative, and infrastructural impulses.

After the Second World War, agricultural mechanisation and the rise of tourism transformed the village into one of the region’s major holiday destinations while retaining its historically evolved settlement structure.

Four moments of settlement development

Source PDF page 8

A regional locator is followed by four comparable snapshots tracing the shift from dispersed hillside settlement to the present-day pattern.

Six territorial constraints and capacities

Source PDF page 9

The municipal-scale reading compares where growth has occurred with population, suitability, building constraints, and protected buffers.

A compact core on a built-up hillside

Source PDF page 9

Schenna today combines a compact historic core around the church and castle with large residential and tourist structures. Hotels, guesthouses, and holiday apartments occupy the hillside in terraces with wide views over the valley.

Hamlets and scattered farmsteads such as Verdins and Prenn are connected by a network of access roads. The source notes that available orthophotos do not support analysis at regular time intervals.

Land use, fabric, and movement

Source PDF page 9

Three linked readings move from the inhabited hillside to densification potential and the structure of local circulation.

Connecting three centralities

Source PDF page 9

A new joint is proposed between the historic centre, the emerging centre, and the settlement to connect movement flows along the hillside.

Exploring a new centre

Source PDF page 10

A family of sketches tests how buildings, green space, access, and public ground can be rearranged within the same sloping site.

Three alternatives for the new centre

Source PDF page 10

The selected proposals are parallel alternatives. Each pairs a hillside section with a site plan and a distinct balance of housing, mixed use, views, green space, and public life.

  • Alternative 1

    Residential continuity

    • Prioritises residential development.
    • Treats the connecting street as an intimate sequence of public and green space.
    • Places mixed uses along the promenade and toward the existing centres.
  • Alternative 2

    Views and public interaction

    • Prioritises views and public spaces for interaction.
    • Activates new green space through mixed use.
    • Tests a more urban arrangement with varied green cover.
  • Alternative 3

    Structured public realm

    • Builds a hierarchy of differently scaled spaces.
    • Protects an undisturbed view and open ground.
    • Creates a central, structured public space with less emphasis on housing and more on public use.

Project credits

Source PDF pages 8 and 9 and 10

Urban and landscape planning
LIA Collective
Graphics
Saba Seighali with LIA Collective; the portfolio identifies page 9 as team-work material
Status
Work in progress
Source
Supplied portfolio PDF, PDF pages 8–10 (printed pages 14, 16, and 18)