Municipal settlement plan · work in progress
Schenna
A communal development program for territory and landscape.

Landscape as the planning framework
Source PDF page 8
The current-state analysis begins with landscape as the framework, resource, and identity of Schenna. Its ecological network is treated as infrastructure to be strengthened and woven further into the urban fabric, supporting quality of life, climate resilience, and sustainable development.
Development prioritises internal growth over outward expansion: vacant properties are activated, existing structures are reused, and densification is tied to resource-efficient construction. New areas are considered only when they demonstrate a clear community need and added value.
Natural hazards remain active planning criteria. Building responds to the dynamics of slopes, water, and soil, while squares, paths, neighbourhood meeting points, and nearby landscapes form a connected network of short distances and everyday encounters.
A settlement shaped by agriculture and tourism
Source PDF page 8
Until the nineteenth century, Schenna developed as a dispersed agricultural settlement, with farmsteads spread along the slopes. The acquisition of Schenna Castle by Archduke Johann of Austria in 1845 brought new cultural, administrative, and infrastructural impulses.
After the Second World War, agricultural mechanisation and the rise of tourism transformed the village into one of the region’s major holiday destinations while retaining its historically evolved settlement structure.
Four moments of settlement development
Source PDF page 8
A regional locator is followed by four comparable snapshots tracing the shift from dispersed hillside settlement to the present-day pattern.
Six territorial constraints and capacities
Source PDF page 9
The municipal-scale reading compares where growth has occurred with population, suitability, building constraints, and protected buffers.
A compact core on a built-up hillside
Source PDF page 9
Schenna today combines a compact historic core around the church and castle with large residential and tourist structures. Hotels, guesthouses, and holiday apartments occupy the hillside in terraces with wide views over the valley.
Hamlets and scattered farmsteads such as Verdins and Prenn are connected by a network of access roads. The source notes that available orthophotos do not support analysis at regular time intervals.
Land use, fabric, and movement
Source PDF page 9
Three linked readings move from the inhabited hillside to densification potential and the structure of local circulation.
Connecting three centralities
Source PDF page 9
A new joint is proposed between the historic centre, the emerging centre, and the settlement to connect movement flows along the hillside.
Exploring a new centre
Source PDF page 10
A family of sketches tests how buildings, green space, access, and public ground can be rearranged within the same sloping site.
Three alternatives for the new centre
Source PDF page 10
The selected proposals are parallel alternatives. Each pairs a hillside section with a site plan and a distinct balance of housing, mixed use, views, green space, and public life.
Alternative 1
Residential continuity
- Prioritises residential development.
- Treats the connecting street as an intimate sequence of public and green space.
- Places mixed uses along the promenade and toward the existing centres.
Residential continuitySaba Seighali with LIA Collective Alternative 2
Views and public interaction
- Prioritises views and public spaces for interaction.
- Activates new green space through mixed use.
- Tests a more urban arrangement with varied green cover.
Views and public interactionSaba Seighali with LIA Collective Alternative 3
Structured public realm
- Builds a hierarchy of differently scaled spaces.
- Protects an undisturbed view and open ground.
- Creates a central, structured public space with less emphasis on housing and more on public use.
Structured public realmSaba Seighali with LIA Collective
Project credits
Source PDF pages 8 and 9 and 10
- Urban and landscape planning
- LIA Collective
- Graphics
- Saba Seighali with LIA Collective; the portfolio identifies page 9 as team-work material
- Status
- Work in progress
- Source
- Supplied portfolio PDF, PDF pages 8–10 (printed pages 14, 16, and 18)